Lim Yan Peng, Gary (3S216) 30th
April 2012
Reflective Journal 5
I feel that the
Socio-Economic Studies is generally very enriching and beneficial in allowing
me to study in depth about the cultures of Western and Eastern cultures.
However, there are several flaws in this curriculum that have hindered my
learning journey as well.
Ever since the first day I embarked onto this
module, my knowledge of Western and Chinese cultures have indeed increased by a
huge margin. Even though I had been completely clueless about SES before
beginning on this module, the lectures, the class presentations and the class
discussions are truly effective in guiding me step by step in understanding the
details of every module. I feel that the class discussions, reflective journals,
together with the lectures conducted by Ms Yeo allowed me to view each case
study from different perspectives. It exposed me to fresh insights and
encouraged me to think more critically about the origins of various cultures as
well as their effects on various aspects of the societies.
Honestly, I agreed that there is an information
overload as the vast amount of case studies covered in the first two terms are
too much for us to digest easily. Not only must we go in depth to study the
origins of Confucianism and Western ideologies, we are also expected to observe
how these cultures affect the lives of Chinese or Westerners and how their
actions, or their political and corporate systems reflect the way these people
think. Furthermore, I feel that we have spent insufficient amount of time in
class to think critically about some of the more significant case studies. By
spending more time on a smaller number of significant and interesting lessons,
students will then be able to enjoy the lessons at a more relaxed pace. At the
same time, students can also gain more useful insights by analysing each case
study more critically and thus, leaving a deeper and memorable impression for
them.
Somehow, I find that it impossible to link what
I have learnt in class to the real life world. Why are we studying the origins
and the roots of the American’s ideology of liberty and Confucianism? If the
aim of this module is to educate us on cultural intelligence and how we should
act when we are in a Chinese or Western society, I believe all we should know
is simply their basic philosophies and cultures and their applications in real
life situations. Hence, I feel that some topics are irrelevant and hence should
be removed so that we can spend more time studying in depth on topics such as
corporate cultures and political systems of the various societies as I believe
these are the aspects that matter to us more if we were to travel to such
societies in future.
Apart from the information overload, I feel
that too much is expected from us students who already have very busy schedules
in school. We are often expected to read through many lengthy articles provided
online and prepare lesson notes for the subsequent lessons when much of the
contents in the articles could be irrelevant. In fact, many of my classmates actually
do their self-research instead of spending precious moments poring through the
“essential readings”. It was then that I thought perhaps I should learn from my
friends as they claimed other online sources and sites provide equally useful
information which is much more easily extracted. Furthermore, it entirely
defeats the purpose if students were always complaining about the vast amount
of research to be done for each module when it was only briefly discussed
about. Why do we still study if the whole learning process seems like a chore
for students? I feel that by feeding us large amount of information within a
short time, it is difficult for me to absorbed and apply the knowledge I learnt
as I develop little interest for the topics covered.
Sometimes, I feel that the expectations of the
students’ assignments are too high. I admit that I have difficulties conveying
my ideas in an organised manner using proper and fluent language. However, it
was truly difficult for some students, like me, to present on a certain topic
fluently and clearly to the class alone. The presenter has to spend a lot of
time rehearsing and preparing for their presentation and there are some
students who have limited preparation time due to their busy schedule. As such,
some students were unable to grasp the main points of the class discussion which
were unclear and confusing. The presenter himself will also score badly for his
class presentation due to poor presentation skills or lack of content. I
propose that students should work in pairs on a single discussion topic so as
to reduce the amount of workload and also ensure that class presentations are
made clearer for the class to understand.
Overall, I enjoyed some of the topics covered
in this module and I certainly support the idea of having reflective journals
and class discussions as they allow us to view things from different
perspectives and also learn from our peers. However, I do hope that the flaws
highlighted above can be considered and the module can be slightly modified to
provide students with a challenging, but enjoyable and fulfilling learning
environment.
(806 words)
Dear Gary,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed your post! However, there are some points I would like to raise.
Firstly, I do not think that studying the origins and the roots of the American’s ideology of liberty and Confucianism is totally useless. On top of teaching us how we should behave when we go to these countries, it makes us understand how the companies in these countries are run and what is the political environment in these countries like. Knowing why the people in China and America think and behave in a certain way is important. We should try to understand what drives the behaviour and not merely accept that is how they will behave.
Also, I do agree that preparing for the lesson is very time consuming and tiring most of the time, especially when the readings are pitched at a higher level. However, I still think that reading up on the topic beforehand is essential. SES is all about getting us to discuss and give our views for the different issues. If we do not read up before the lesson, we will not have enough contextual knowledge to engage in a fruitful and meaningful discussion. Then Ms. Yeo has to go through the information in the reading materials which means we will not have enough time for discussion. This will defeat the real purpose of this subject. Now that we only need to prepare one question, the workload is more manageable compared to the first term.
Lastly, I think we need to think through your suggestion on having pair work for Term Presentation further. If the work is done in pairs and if one student puts in a lot more efforts than the other, it is fair for both to get the same marks? There is no way for the teacher to know how the work is divided and who has put in more efforts. There is no such issue if it is individual work. So although I do not completely disagree with your suggestion, I think some fine tuning is needed to make it fair for the students.
Thank you.
Regards,
Alastair (3S2 19)